Refunds post to the wrong account
Finance finds it at month-end close. By then the correction touches hundreds of records and nobody can prove which ones.
Sync Nexus connects any system to any other system — Shopify Plus, Adobe Commerce, NetSuite, SAP, Business Central, Sage — from a sentence of plain English. A governed AI plans the flow against your live runtime. An enterprise engine executes it and records every single record.
Live flow generated from your own prompt during the call — no slideware.
Draft is stopped. Nothing runs until a human approves it.
Commerce, ERP, finance, fulfilment, marketplace and operational systems
Commerce integration has stayed expensive for one reason: a human consultant hand-builds every flow. Here is what the market currently charges for that.
Typical commerce ↔ ERP implementation fee
Enterprise Shopify Plus to NetSuite or SAP timeline
36-month total at ~$25M GMV, including internal ops time
How long Shopify retries a failed webhook before data is simply gone
Finance finds it at month-end close. By then the correction touches hundreds of records and nobody can prove which ones.
The sync "works". Then a warehouse is added, a SKU splits, and oversells start — with no record of when the drift began.
One order failed. The only recovery tool re-processes 40,000 of them, and now you are debugging the fix instead of the fault.
Three layers, each doing the job it is actually good at.
Sync Nexus classifies your intent, reads your live runtime inventory and exact processor descriptors, then plans a real flow graph. Not a template. Not a guess from a language model's memory.
AI may interpret, rank, explain and propose. It may not authenticate, authorize, publish, retry, mutate a live flow, or expose a secret. That is architecture, not a prompt instruction.
Immutable step snapshots with timestamps, outcomes, attempt numbers and lineage. Business identities — order number, SKU — become the parent record. You search for the order, not the log line.
Success flows down. Failures bias left into recovery. Nothing is lost, and nothing is re-run wholesale.
We are not discounting the work. We removed it. Legacy integrators charge $30K–$200K because a consultant hand-builds every flow across four to seven months. Our AI produces the first working draft against your live systems in minutes.
Quoted elsewhere
$0
With Sync Nexus
$0
Implementation plus absorbed internal ops time, before any subscription.
Modelled on published 2026 market benchmarks for commerce ↔ ERP integration. Indicative only — your review produces real figures.
Celigo and Patchworks are good products. Boomi and Workato are capable platforms. They were all designed before an AI could read a runtime and plan against it.
| Sync Nexus v3 | Celigo / Patchworks | Boomi / Workato | Custom build | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How a flow gets built | AI plans it from a sentence | Template plus manual config | Manual, technical | A developer writes code |
| Implementation cost | $0 | $15K–$50K+ | $50K+ | $30K–$200K |
| Time to first live flow | Days | 6–14 weeks | 4–7 months | 4–7 months |
| Pricing model | Flat subscription | Tiered | Consumption — escalates with volume | Perpetual developer cost |
| When one record fails | Retry that record from a checkpoint | Re-run the batch | Re-run the job | Write a script |
| AI governance boundary | Published and architecturally enforced | Copilot add-on | Copilot add-on | None |
| Execution runtime | Apache NiFi 2.10 — open source | Proprietary | Proprietary | Bespoke |
| Scope | Any system to any system | Commerce and ERP | Broad, generic | One integration |
Competitor cost and timeline figures are drawn from published 2026 market research, not from private benchmarks. Sources are listed in our integration review pack.
Sixty minutes with an integration architect. We take your real requirement, generate the flow live, and show you the execution trace it would produce. No cost, no obligation, no slideware.